Talk:Edelio López Falcón

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Edelio López Falcón/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 05:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

 Working buidhe 05:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC) After reading through the article I am confident that it meets all of the GA criteria. A really well researched and well put together article. The one issue that I encountered was lots of dead links to El Norte articles, even those that were archived. However, dead links aren't part of the GA criteria. buidhe 16:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Buidhe: Hi, thank you for the review! The sources for El Norte are subscription-only (hence the red lock) because they were only released in print version and only paid subscribers can access them. I simply added a URL to their main page so the red lock could appear. If not I would get an error message. MX () 17:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    MX, Makes sense! Great work on this article. It's a shame you have to wait so long for a review. buidhe 17:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]