Talk:Edmund Rubbra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Which is the proper article, by the way- avoid redirects!)

Removed a polemical sentence. There are works - mostly in his shelf drawer to my knowledge, including the discarded piano concerto opus 30 I think? - in which Rubbra approached and/or used the twelve-tone technique in one way or another; and he was one of many composers who "refused to use it". How this fit in with Glock's tenure at the BBC, with whom it was or was not fashionable, and other matters- indeed, calling it fashionable is something that requires considerable explanation and should not be done at the beginning of an encyclopedia at -all-, it's rather an in-joke; fashionable among composers perhaps (I like many works composed written using the technique, and am at most an ex-composer) but not (yet?) the general public (some works by Schoenberg, Webern and Berg work very well, and I will say because of good use of the technique- I am not making a polemical anti-serial case here, I am saying that claiming it was fashionable immediately announces "I'm talking to my own audience, because it certainly wasn't fashionable among people you knew, was it?" to most readers... which is rather anti-Wikipedia right there...) - (edit to finish the sentence *g*) ... how that fits in with Glock, composer culture in the 20th century, ...- much too large a topic.

Getting back to Rubbra: he did not refuse to be diverted apparently- he tried the method, and decided not to use it later. That's a diversion and a decision. A small difference and not worthy of an opening paragiraffe distinction; instead, I think, worthy of opening paragraph -omission-, making Rubbra someone who cannot be brought in into the Stubborn Won't Even Taste the Green Eggs and Ham Army... - hence, my deletion. Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Photo[edit]

Can someone please upload a suitable photo of this important (but shamefully neglected) composer? John Hamilton (talk) 15:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nine months later and still no photo. A search on Google provides several suitable images; I'd upload one of these if I understood which would pass the Wikipedia criteria. Perhaps someone with more Wiki-experience would do so? John Hamilton (talk) 10:20, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nine YEARS later and still no photo. I refer to my comments of 2008 and 2009. Surely someone better versed than I am in the technicalities of Wiki could spare a little time to upload a photo or two of Edmund Rubbra? John Hamilton (talk) 00:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would second the need for a photo as well.

I also think the whole article is way too detailed, informal add chatty - I think it needs to be more academic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.155.228.253 (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC) Bold text[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edmund Rubbra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The army trio may have continued to meet, but by the time of the 1952 Broadhurst Gardens sessions for Decca at which Rubbra's First Piano Trio was recorded, the violinist was Erich Gruenberg, as he was when I heard them in (I think) 1956 in the Mozart E major and Brahms C major trios in Oxford, around the time of the Piano Concerto and the early performances of the Sixth Symphony.Delahays (talk) 00:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]