Talk:Edward Nally (solicitor)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

He is a member of the new Judicial Appointments Commission for choosing judges in the UK. This is an important article about the constitution of the UK as for centuries the Lord Chancellor has had the power to appoint judges. JRawle (Talk) 16:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete roll play section again especially as Jedi is now officially accepted in UK census as a religion. See Jedi Census Phenomenem and uk has a Jedi member of parliment. Deletions from outside the UK show lack of knowlege of the importance of this matter in Uk. Mr Nally is clearly an important figure in the Fantasy reenactment movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.104.125.157 (talk) 21:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. In that case, perhaps you could provide some official document or reference that corroborates your assertions as to his midichlorian count? Until that proof arrives, I'll persist in regarding that assertion as a nonsensical hoax unfit for an encyclopedia. For the rest of it, whatever rank he holds in the relevant organizations needs to be attested in the same way as his membership in the Law Society, by provision of reliable sources; material not corroborated by reliable sources is subject to being removed. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:21, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps articles refering to Jesus should be treated the same way, in that case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.104.125.157 (talk) 23:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That argument is known here as "other stuff exists" -- follow the link for the full explanation -- and isn't considered very useful. We're talking about this article, the subject of which is contemporaneous, not historical, and your apparent inability to confirm the remarkable statement that you have insisted on including with reference to this individual's "midichlorian count", and other corroboration that is required for his association with various organizations. Another specific policy that applies here is the biography of living persons policy -- I assume you're not asserting that Mr. Nally is deceased -- and that policy requires that statements about living persons need to be corroborated by reliable sources. In fact, corroboration of statements is a very basic principle here; you can find out more about it generally at this article and the specifics at this article. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edward Nally (solicitor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060504141023/http://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/about/chair_commissioners.htm to http://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/about/chair_commissioners.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]