Talk:Electric Spine

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Electric Spine.

Extent of Scheme[edit]

Although the Draft CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan referred to in the notes clearly refers (p.45) to the electrification of the Reading - Basingstoke Line as part of this scheme (but suggests that it may not be delivered within CP5: see p.81), it would appear that First Great Western consider that this line will be electrified as part of the electrification of the Thames Valley branchlines (see https://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/About-Us/greater-west/bagw/LTV) and is due to be completed in stage 2 of that scheme. Is anyone able to explain this apparent discrepancy? Ntmr (talk) 13:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan (March 2015) p.56 says "Electrification (25kv AC overhead) of the route between Reading (Southcote Junction) and Basingstoke: This scope of works for this scheme and its relevant milestones will be reported through the Thames Valley Branch Lines Electrification entry (Project reference code: W003)."Ingafube (talk) 08:35, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electric Spine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160204213454/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/Enhancements-Delivery-Plan-Update.pdf to http://www.networkrail.co.uk/enhancements-delivery-plan-update.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stub[edit]

I removed stub classification as it is clearly way beyond that 01:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC) GRALISTAIR (talk) 01:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]