Talk:Electron backscatter diffraction/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Keresluna (talk · contribs) 16:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll review this chemistry article, but might be a little slow in doing it. Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 16:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Feel free to reject these suggestions as you see fit. Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 17:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'grain structure, grains orientation,' → 'grain structure, grain orientation,' Y
'wavelength dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDS)' →'wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDS)' Y

'compact lens which focuses the image' → 'compact lens that focuses the image'
'intersections form what are known as Kikuchi patterns or electron backscatter patterns' → 'intersections form what is known as Kikuchi patterns or electron backscatter patterns' Y
'to the crystal orientation (based upon their interplanar angles).' → 'to the crystal orientation (based on their interplanar angles).' Y
'one must use a many beam dynamical' → 'one must use a many-beam dynamical' Y
'EBSP quality is sensitive to the surface preparation' → 'EBSP quality is sensitive to surface preparation' Y
'do not mention a definition, or do not even present' → 'do not mention a definition or do not even present' Y

'leading methods of the indexing performed by most' → 'leading methods of indexing performed by most' Y
'algorithms and calculations, but is essential' → 'algorithms and calculations but is essential' Y
'each of these methods are cumbersome' → 'each of these methods is cumbersome' Y
'Recent development of AstroEBSD and PCGlobal' → 'The recent development of AstroEBSD and PCGlobal' Y

'measured geometrical shifts from in the pattern' → 'measured geometrical shifts in the pattern' Y
'by using Einstein summation convention with symmetry' → 'by using the Einstein summation convention with symmetry' Y
'which can produce an accurate measurements' → 'which can produce accurate measurements' (note: I don't think you need the wikilink to accurate in there) Y (left the wiki-link, accuracy and precision are normally confused)

'average atomic number of the sample, and is used' → 'average atomic number of the sample and is used'
'which has been introduced around 1970s, and' → 'which has been introduced around the 1970s, and' Y
'prepared for TKD using an FIB or ion milling machine' → 'prepared for TKD using a FIB or ion milling machine' Y

thanks for the these comments. I left some of the Oxford commas FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The chart in the section 'Precision and development' needs proper axes, for an example, see lithium thiocyanate. Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 17:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:44, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Keresluna you left 'y' outside, i.e., {{GAList/check|}y}. maybe you want to correct that FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]