Talk:Elena Myers

American English

Myers is American, so I have set the variant to American English and will soon convert all the dmy dates to mdy dates. A diehard editor (talk | edits) 13:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Career statistics

2010 AMA Pro SuperSport West

Round	1		2		3		4		5		6		7		8		9		10
Date	March 3–5		March 26–28		April 16–18		May 14–16		June 4–6		July 16–18		July 23–25		August 13–15		September 3–5		September 24–26
Location	Daytona International Speedway		Auto Club Speedway		Road Atlanta		Infineon Raceway		Road America		Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course		Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca		Virginia International Raceway		New Jersey Motorsports Park		Barber Motorsports Park
Race	1	2	1	2	1	2	1	2	1	2	1	2	1	2	1	2	1	2	1	2
Start	7	7	4	4	7	4	8
Finish	7	7	13	4	1	5
Points	7	7	13	DNS	DNS	-	-
Total points	14	28	28	28	28	28	28

--Dbratland (talk) 06:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

The cumulative points, as well as the starting positions, above are clearly wrong. I don't seem to know what I'm doing here, or else the AMA's site is full of errors. Either way, if anybody knows how to make a correct season chart please do so and add it to the article. Thanks! --Dbratland (talk) 06:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

These standings are also wrong: Events: SuperSport Rider Standings, American Motorcyclist Association, retrieved 2010-05-21, as of today. They list a total of 3 rounds, when it should be 4. It says Myers won race 1, round 3, which is actually the result of round 4. It seems to have skipped round 3 and put the result of round 4 in it's place. I don't think there is any way to know how they arrived at 92 points based on what's currently on the AMA site. --Dbratland (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Headers

Just to clarify, in case my edit summary wasn't clear enough, a "references" section is used either (a) as a combined cite and reference section, or (b) to give the full details of the sources referred to in the cites. A reference section is not used as a collection of links that happen to be about the topic but which are not actually used to cite the article. That's what "Further reading" and/or "External links" sections are for, which is why I changed the headers. Gatoclass (talk) 19:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

That's fine. My nit was the difference between external links and further reading. And my understanding is that further reading may also be called references, and notes may also be called reference -- so either of the two recent versions are OK. It's somewhat moot since I wrote up notes off line to merge almost all of the un-footnoted articles into the footnotes anyway. My intent in including the long list of articles, especially on a new article, is so other editors can easily use them to expand the article if I don't get to it first. Cheers! --Dbratland (talk) 04:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)