Talk:Eleven Past One

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (this article is based on a canadian pop Band Eleven Past One) --MusicPromoter1 (talk) 21:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, it's written to promote the band rather than just inform about them. It needs a complete rewrite, using original text, not text copied from last.fm or any other site on the web. —C.Fred (talk) 21:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

…Which I've just done. —C.Fred (talk) 21:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eleven Past One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150812171325/http://elevenpastonemusic.com/about/ to http://www.elevenpastonemusic.com/about/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changes needed[edit]

I agree with a lot of the things which have been posted here, I think the page as a whole, while containing good information, does need an overhaul before us meagre copyeditors get in there. It'd be nice to apply the standard format for musicians to put the discographies, performances, etc. in boxes and sections as is typical. I don't think it should be outright deleted, but alternative sources should definitely be found when needed, and we could clean up the tone and verbiage once major format overhauls have been made BerkutSimp (talk) 03:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]