Talk:Embryonic (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Double album?[edit]

Why is it a double album? 73:02 is short enough to fit it on one CD. Is Wayne referring to the LP? 84.112.202.36 (talk) 16:51, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I recieved the regular edition through the post this morning, and it is indeed only on one CD. Perhaps describing it as a double album is an artistic choice of sorts? ie. The band consider the album to be in two parts thematically/musically? Pure speculation, mind. mode_seven (talk) 13:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're correct, "double-album" refers to the LP. Most vinyl LPs only contain six or so songs per side, so Embryonic would definitely require four sides (i.e. two records). The term, of course, comes from the time when vinyl was the primary medium for music, and although nowadays CDs can allow much larger runlengths, vinyl LPs are still being released (and making quite a comeback at that), so the distinction of "double album" is still necessary. And I agree with the previous poster, lots of bands use the double-album to achieve certain artistic goals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.127.52.201 (talk) 14:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the use of the 'double album' label is misleading. Since the CD became the standard, countless artists have issued long single-disc albums that would require two vinyl records to fit, and they generally don't call such albums 'double albums'. Most people today, I believe, consider new albums to be double when they're released on two CD's. In the base of Embryonic, the deluxe version is contained on two CD's; the normal version contained on one. Reputedly, both versions of the album are the same length. Also, the Flaming Lips' 'Hit to Death in the Future Head' is technically a double-album by vinyl standards, being over an hour long, so it's not correct to say that Embryonic is their first double-albums, no matter what standard you use.64.122.56.143 (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Embryonic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Embryonic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Embryonic_(album)&oldid=1198737513"