Talk:Endogeny (biology)

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-11-04. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Endogeny (biology) is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Older comments[edit]

I think it might be a good idea to merge this article with exogenous. Just my 2 cents.

Both articles are horrible, but expanded versions might warrant separate articles Plasticup ^T/C 03:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal: Exogeny into Endogeny (biology)[edit]

I propose to merge Exogeny into Endogeny (biology) since they cover sufficiently similar topics that they can be explained within the same context. Jamgoodman (talk) 19:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Other fields[edit]

The title and lede are written in order to make this an article about biology. The section about the term in other fields is off-topic. This is what hatnotes are for. Wikiacc (¶) 03:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments invited. (Pinging Jamgoodman.) Wikiacc (¶) 03:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, all that stuff was, with respect, rubbish, totally off-topic. All that's left is a WP:DICDEF which shouldn't be on Wikipedia either. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]