Talk:Enrolled bill

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Proposed merge.[edit]

I propose merging Enrolled bill rule here because this page is currently a stub, and a borderline dicdef, while the page to be merged is basically vital information about an enrolled bill that would be right at home here. I also propose merging Engrossed bill here because that article is a substub which will probably never be further expanded, and can be incorporated in this article with a single line noting that an engrossed bill is a step away from being an enrolled bill. bd2412 T 23:46, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree about Enrolled bill rule. It is different enough to warrant its own article, and is capable of expansion. I sort of disagree about the others, insofar as I believe they should both be merged into Bill (law). -Rrius (talk) 13:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree with Rrius. The Enrolled bill rule is a rule of judicial construction. Therefore, it applies to a different branch of government. I do agree with both of you (I think) in saying that neither Engrossed bill nor Enrolled bill warrant separate pages. They are probably dicdefs and as such should be rolled into Bill (law). -el757 (talk) 14:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn the Enrolled bill rule merge proposal. I agree with merging both into the appropriate section of Bill (law). bd2412 T 15:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]