This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Many thanks to those who have filled gaps and added new information. The footnote styles have, however, become a bit inconsistent. Should we not settle on a consistent style? Hope I am not being too fussy.
--Shirazibustan (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Shirazibustan[reply]
Hi Shirazibustan. I'll work on unifying the format of the footnotes later today (I used the WP:CITET because they help with machine-readable text, like COinS). However, feel free to be bold and make any changes that you think will help the article. Thanks! Phoenixred (talk) 13:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much, the result looks really good. --Shirazibustan—Preceding undated comment added 21:47, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
