Talk:Epipolar geometry
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
Revert on 2007-08-16[edit]
I reverted the edits just made because
- From Hartley and Zisserman's book: "The epipolar geometry is the intrisic projective geometry between two views". They and also other authors appear to use this concept exclusively for the two-view case, and refer to the general cases as N-view geometry. Please provide reasonable references for a more general use of epiolar geometry before changing back again.
- To say that cameras are different is ambiguous. They could be identical and even the same camera for the two views. If we by different mean that they have different positions in space this must be expliciit. I will fix that.
--KYN 08:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Mismatch between Figure and Text[edit]
The text in the opening paragraphs refers to the figure and specifically to a point P, but there is no point in the figure labeled as such; rather, the point in question appears to be labeled X, although it's hard to tell.
<anon> 18:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Terminology[edit]
Anyone have any insight to why it's called "epi"? Ie. what does "epi" mean (which language of origin?) 128.113.74.67 (talk) 16:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Usually Greek = upon, among ? Not sure why here !--195.137.93.171 (talk) 21:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)