Talk:Equatorial Guinea at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Equatorial Guinea at the 2008 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 15, 2018. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Equatorial Guinea at the 2008 Summer Olympics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Equatorial Guinea Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Equatorial Guinea (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was created or improved during the "African 10,000 Challenge", which started in 1 September 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Eric Moussambani[edit]

I don't know whether it's worth pointing out in the article itself, but Eric Moussambani won't be competing in Beijing. [1] Aridd (talk) 18:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aridd: Added that information into the article. So sorry that you've had to wait nine years for somebody to respond to you! MWright96 (talk)
  - @MWright96: Thanks! Aridd (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Equatorial Guinea at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 08:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The delegation included two athletics competitors and one judoka: the sprinter Reginaldo Ndong who was joined by middle-distance runner Emilia Mikue Ondo and half-middleweight judoka José Mba Nchama. - rewrite this From Ndong and Mikue Ondo progressed no farther than the first round of their respective events and Mba Nchama was eliminated from contention in the second round of the contest he was entered for. To Ndong and Mikue Ondo progressed no farther than the first round of their respective events and Mba Nchama was eliminated from contention in the second round of the contest. She qualified for the games capitalize Games After his match, he said while he was amazed at the spirit of the Olympic Games, he would have preferred to have advance further in the competition while also not ruling out competing at the 2012 Olympic Games in London. - rephrase this
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	None suspected
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Yup
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Looks good
	7. Overall assessment.	Just some grammar to fix.

@Kees08: Thanks for the review. Every point you have raised has been dealt with. MWright96 (talk) 09:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]