Talk:Eristic

Philosophy: Epistemology / Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Logic

As the most recent editor to the page, I had a hard time deciding whether philosophy and rhetoric should separate at all. In the end, I decided to separate them, as my contributions dealt more with rhetoric than philsophy as we understand it... Knightedsorrow (talk) 04:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC)knightedsorrow[reply]

Scratch my last edit comment — there are a sufficient number of links. TheBusiness 15:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stuck[edit]

I completely disagree with everything this article says. Wait a minute...

24.130.9.180 (talk) 07:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]