Talk:Essence of Time

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 23 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Essence of Time (movement) to Essence of Time. The result of the discussion was moved.

June 2013[edit]

кургинянцы, вы хоть иглиш шпрахе выучите. совсем больные на голову совки.

для дебилов и либероидов - текст писали люди из европейской ячейки клуба, которые от рождения на "инглише" говорят. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.255.68.78 (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it fascist[edit]

Read this post on Louis Proyects blog - [1] - I'm concerned the article may be biased. Sayerslle (talk) 23:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It`s clear, that the article is written by "Essence of Time" members. Of course, it is biased. 94.45.129.180 (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly do you see the article as biased? You also should understand that calling a left-oriented political organization "fascist" is not just a ridiculous, but also an insulting claim. --eugrus (talk) 21:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biased[edit]

The principles section lacks a neutral point of view. Please see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view for more information. Reads as if it were trying to gain support of the movement. If the original author was quoting something for the more biased passages, they should cite the source. Wwmadi (talk) 3:02, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 23 March 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 06:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Essence of Time (movement) → Essence of Time – I do not think "movement" is needed in parentheses to disambiguate the article as it appears that no other topic on Wikipedia uses the name "Essence of Time". Essence of Time itself is a redirect to this article. I think one could make a weak case for Time is of the essence sharing use of "Essence of Time", although I personally would not make this argument because I have never seen the latter be used to refer to the former (this is the only counterargument I can think of). Regardless, a hatnote would suffice if this argument was made successfully and received widespread support. CentreLeftRight ✉ 07:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nom. Essence of Time originally redirected to The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons and Oracle of Ages, but I don't see the connection. 162 etc. (talk) 16:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The "Essences of Time" seem to be an element of the game's plot. However, because they do not have a dedicated section in the article as they are mere MacGuffins, they should not be the main target for a redirect (or the primary topic), nor are they notable enough for a hatnote in this article, in my opnion. CentreLeftRight ✉ 19:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Disambiguation is clearly not needed here. BD2412 T 04:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.