Talk:Ethernet Powerlink
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Dated?[edit]
This seems dated, since most Ethernets have used switches for many years and so do not have the collisions mentioned here. More on when this was used (if ever?) needs to be clarified. W Nowicki (talk) 22:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
This is a realtime industrial protocol, where latency must be avoided. Switches have very high latency, so powerlink uses hubs instead. Powerlink is in use today.Brolin (talk) 09:52, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
EPL runs on standard Ethernet hardware and avoids collisions based on the master controlling all communications (polling slaves for responses). Compare this with ProfiNet or EtherCat which require specialized Ethernet hardware to avoid collisions. Switches should be avoided because the cause latency, but that problem is getting better as the electronics speed up. You still generally should not use switches with EPL, but you can in a pinch; for instance, try finding a hub at your local electronics store (not going to happen). As far as when it was used and by who, it's been in use since 2001 and is currently (end of 2013) used in 9% (for comparison, ModbusTCP is 17% and Ethernet/IP and ProfiNet are both 30%) of all industrial Ethernet applications and 20% of Real-Time, Deterministic industrial Ethernet applications (second only to ProfiNet. Its share is growing quickly due to increasing market penetration of B&R industrial hardware. EPL is state of the art, it's on the way up, not the way out. [1].50.78.52.249 (talk) 21:56, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
References
More info on version differences?[edit]
They are currently on EPLv2 which is quite a big difference from EPLv1, but I don't know the gritty details on protocol changes. They've also introduced Poll Response Chaining to cut down on cycle times. I've heard EPLv3 might happen when IEEE 1588 updates.
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ethernet Powerlink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120817070946/http://www.arcweb.com/strategy-reports/2012-04-12/opensafety-initiative-aims-to-unify-industrial-safety-protocols.aspx to http://www.arcweb.com/strategy-reports/2012-04-12/opensafety-initiative-aims-to-unify-industrial-safety-protocols.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)