This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
I know that Butler's long dead, but shouldn't we give this guy some benefit of the doubt and refer to him as a "suspected" serial killer? The article doesn't suggest the existence of conclusive physical evidence affirming his guilt, and indeed none of the victims found have been identified. So we have means and opportunity, but not motive.
Obviously, the narrative benefits from the assumption of guilt, and yes, he's dead, so it doesn't violate any policies, but I still think it's unfair to assume Butler's guilt. I'd be interested to know what others think. Matuko (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
