Talk:Eurasia Foundation

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:12, April 27, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Angelcr (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (declared here)
GaijinDad (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (declared here)

On 3 March 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Eurasia Foundation (from Asia). The result of the discussion was not moved.

COI tag (September 2021)[edit]

The creator has a COI per Special:Diff/842423817, and a recent main contributor has declared a COI at Special:Diff/1045701461. bonadea contributions talk 08:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: Based on your info, I updated the {{Connected contributor}} template above. GoingBatty (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 March 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Material Works ^{ping me!} 12:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eurasia Foundation → Eurasia Foundation (from Asia) – "Eurasia Foundation (from Asia)" name was updated to include "from Asia" as that is the official name of their entity and there is another entity in the US called "Eurasia Foundation" founded much earlier in 1992 YGluhova (talk) 14:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. echidnaLives - talk - edits 23:41, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per nom, however, I generally dislike bracketed titles which don't serve a WP:DAB role. --- Tbf69 P • T 15:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eurasia Foundation (from Asia) is the official name of the company. Please refer to http://www.eurasia.or.jp/en/ YGluhova (talk) 16:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware, that's why I've offered my support. --- Tbf69 P • T 11:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Eurasia Foundation from Asia and convert base name to dab per DuckDuckGo query] showing no primary topic. To the first sentence, add stylized as Eurasia Foundation (from Asia). Enwp house style uses parentheses to disambiguate; if there are lots of (post-rename) independent reliable sources, we could justify ignoring the manual of style on article titles. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 23:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: To form a clearer consensus. Noting that Tbf69 has been indeffed. echidnaLives - talk - edits 23:41, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There is currently no need to disambiguate, and per wp:BALL we do not do so based on the hopes and plans of the Foundation. We wait until these other entities not only exist but merit articles in their own right. For the moment, this article covers all such activities, real or proposed, and the current name is the correct one for such an article. Andrewa (talk) 16:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Per WP:NAMECHANGES, as noted by Rotideypoc41352 we can give extra weight to post-name-change sources that use the new name, however I am not seeing any such sources as of now. Once we have a number of reliable sources that use the new name, we may be able to discuss a move, however at the moment this doesn't seem to have the evidence needed. (Edit to note that I don't see an article for the US entity, but if that changes, disambiguating should be non-controversial as long as our standards are followed. In that case, simply (Asia) or a dab using the country where the foundation is headquartered should suffice) ASUKITE 17:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.