Talk:Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hadger 03:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

This article is very great! It is a very good article! --Hadger 23:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I think that the second paragraph in the lead section should be merged into the reception section, because it does tell the reader about the reception. Other than that, the article really follows the Manual of Style.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I put a question mark for the part that says it contains reliable sources because I'm not sure if it counts to just name the page number. However, I think this is probably okay, but I'm not sure. I guess the sources are okay, but adding links would be great! (I don't think you really have to, just a suggestion.)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   It is good because it contains the things about the book that should be mentioned, and it is also good because it doesn't get off-topic and doesn't explain completely different things, but instead just explains information related to the book.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   It follows the neutral point of view policy because it doesn't contain opinions, but instead contains facts about opinions, and it doesn't contain the words to avoid.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   I looked at the history and didn't see any edit wars or any other type of conflict that would somehow harm the the article, which I know you can tell is a good thing.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I understand that it wouldn't be appropriate to add many images since they would probably be non-free, so I am marking this part as neutral.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Congratulations! This article is very great, especially for the fact that it is kind of new. Good job! --Hadger 23:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Cirt (talk) 23:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)