Talk:Excited utterance
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Opie?[edit]
The whole first paragraph is describing an example of an "excited utterance" by a character named Opie. This whole section feels like it does not belong. I mean there certainly can be good examples, but it feels like it was taken from a story or other source and the background information is missing... Is it just me or does this need to be addressed? Robert Beck (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I have reverted this to the last pre-Opie version. This seems to be some kind of inside joke. bd2412 T 17:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Natural law?[edit]
Please clarify to which body of law this article relates, presumably US. I believe the concept does not exist in English law, though I am willing to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.21.90.196 (talk) 09:32, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Yes, this should have added clarity for the jurisdiction(s) to which it applies. Wikipedia is an international website and it shouldn't be assumed that things apply to the US unless it's specified. Mrplastic (talk) 01:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)