Talk:Exnora International

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: Tamil Nadu / Chennai Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chennai (assessed as Low-importance).

POV status of "alert" and "sensitise" on the context of Exnora International[edit]

I don't find "alert" or "sensitise" are POV on the context of this organization because their prime objective is, focusing on preserving nature and preventing environmental degradation.EconomicTiger (talk) 07:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't follow your argument. I can't see how the organization's prime objective, whatever it is, may remove the inherent pov on the language used. Also, I believe I'm not the only user that dislikes the way you want it put. --Damiens.rf 22:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am nervous for anymore reverts. However I am not satisfied the rationale put forwarded by you. You have become the POV of the whole episode, and not the phrase used, based on your previous edits on the article. Cheers.EconomicTiger (talk) 12:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Alert" and "sensitize" are not straightforward or encyclopedic descriptions. They put a slight spin on things that I don't think is the best wording. If you want to say something about alerting and sensitizing people, find a quote from the organization that says that's what they're doing. It's not impartial wording. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We should be careful in this. I've seen many articles that overuse/abuse quotes in a way to give a subliminal impression of endorsement. Since this article already gives the correct neutral information, it shouldn't be changed to contain a (copyrighted/non-free) alternative wording. --Damiens.rf 13:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]