Talk:Exodus of 1879

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas Mid‑importance

	Kansas portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I agree that merging the articles is appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.33.72.143 (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Exodusters[edit]

It doesn't seem that there is anything appreciably unique that can be said about Exodusters so I recommend merging it here.

--Mcorazao (talk) 03:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I support a merge. faithless (^speak) 10:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No they should not be merged. Exodusters were unique in their own way —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.25.32.177 (talk) 01:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Merging of Exodusters into the Exodus of 1879[edit]

I believe that neither of the two articles are very rich in detail, and don't offer as comprehensive an analysis as could be possible in their respective topics. If the two were to merge, and if a person searching for either of the two specifically could be redirected to the new article, I am of the opinion that they would only help each other. I'm all for the merging of the two, and if someone could put some more illuminating information into the new improved article, it would be much appreciated.