Talk:Extant Theatre Company

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Theatre

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Extant Theatre Company is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

This page should not be speedy deleted because...[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Tamasine22 (talk) sorry if it appears that way. I have no connections with the company. i am just documenting a missing notable company. you are right i am new at the game and a bit slow but learning all the time. I am at an editathon workshop trying to learn how to do it right. Tamasine22 (talk) 14:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I understand. I'll get rid of the deletion tag and replace it with some issue tags. Thanks for the quick response and your contribution to Wikipedia. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 14:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the assertion of notability seems to be in good faith and it otherwise seems to be a good faith article. Deletion may indeed be the proper end result, but articles for deletion would be the proper path in this case. This would allow for a full discussion by interested parties on both sides of the issue and we would be far more likely to come to consensus. I can find no policy violation or any other reason for a speedy deletion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Theatre by actor blind[edit]

What ptocess for casting and training. to space and stage? Lephen Purwanto (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]