Talk:Extended peer community

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 4 November 2023 by reviewer Vanderwaalforces (talk · contribs).

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tone[edit]

After some editing I removed the 'tone' stub and the piece seems to me reasonably clear and encyclopedic. I welcome suggestions for improvement. Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 11:27, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New revision[edit]

Notability - A search for the string "extended peer community" in inverted commas on Google Scholar returns 1540 entries. I submit that this indicate academic interest for the concept.

Personal essay - In my revision I considerably shortened the discussion, eliminating what might be seen as 'essay' part and adding reference by various scholars directly engaged with extended peer communities.

Neutrality - The concept - that is relative to possibly conflicted policy setting - may not be perceived ad neutral, but is it considered in both academia and science for policy, where the presumption of neutrality is itself contested. STS literature is concerned with issues of non-neutrality in relation to the use of science for policy, see e.g. the works of Sheila Jasanoff on technologies of humility.^[1]

References

^ Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva. Vol. 41. 3. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320.

References[edit]

[Sheila-1] Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva. Vol. 41. 3. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320.

[1]