Talk:Eye in the Sky (2015 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Release year[edit]

The reference provided indicates that the film is "aiming for a 2015 release". I think this is too loose of wording to consider the film to be a 2015 film. Having a confirmed release date allows us to bypass WP:CRYSTAL, but having a very wishy-washy approximation for a potential release does not support such a categorization. BOVINEBOY2008 20:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References to use[edit]

References to use. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poster selection[edit]

I added the UK poster to the infobox since it is a UK film. There is also a US poster available as seen here. While it is coming out in the US sooner, I do not think this should override this film's roots, in the spirit of MOS:TIES. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 22:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quentin X, where did you find a high-res image of the UK poster? I was hoping to find out to extract credits from the billing block. Thanks for adding Abdi! Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:13, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duh, I see that he was listed in the upper right... I had tunnel vision and focused on only the billing block here. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eye in the Sky (2015 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Real facts[edit]

It claims to be based on real facts. Which ones? --Error (talk) 23:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tam niema żadnych faktów ,ta akcja w filmie to zwykła amatorszczyzna .JuŻ sam fakt , że Dron sobie lata spokojnie nad niebiem Kenii i nikt Go nie z strzelił 5.173.130.95 (talk) 02:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wątpliwośc co do sensu fabuły[edit]

Ta fabuła wywołała krytykę rządu Anglii . Ponieważ reżyser nie zaznaczył , ze to tylko fikcja. Naprawde to po pierwsze , Dron byłby dawno zestrzelony skoro latał na niebie Kenii . Po drugie Namierzanie takie terorysty to dokładne sprawdzenie terenu ,Nigdyy nie daliby specialistycznej kamery drona , owada zwykłemu człowiekowi ,tyym bardziej ze już był spalony - przegoniony . Wysłano by komandosów , a nie zabijana ddziecko . Prosze Was żebyście filmów nie traktowali powważnie ,nawet jak reżyser zapewnia . że to prawda. 5.173.130.95 (talk) 02:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]