Talk:F-41 (Michigan county highway)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 02:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Can some descriptive information be added to the lead? The sentences "Realignments of US 23 spawned both versions of M-171." and "Prior to taking this designation, the route as known as Old M-171 in Iosco County and presently has no other name besides F-41." sound awkward. The last sentence of the history describing the road names should be incorporated into the route description.
- Should be addressed with some copy edits. Imzadi 1979 → 03:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- Can some descriptive information be added to the lead? The sentences "Realignments of US 23 spawned both versions of M-171." and "Prior to taking this designation, the route as known as Old M-171 in Iosco County and presently has no other name besides F-41." sound awkward. The last sentence of the history describing the road names should be incorporated into the route description.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I will place the article on hold for a few fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)