Talk:F/8 and be there/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Taewangkorea (talk · contribs) 00:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
GA Review-Quick failed due to major structural problems failing category 1[edit]
In the article, there appears to be content that is complete, and the article appears to meet the other criteria now, except (see below):.
However, the greatest problem that fails criteria 1 is that the article, which is about a professional term/idiom, does not explain it in the lead section or the beginning, but instead explains f/8 at the end of the article, in a 'specs' section (which probably is not appropriate in this case). The article could be reorganized into one section explaining the term f/8 (specs) and why it came into being (including first 1/2 of background), and another for the philosophy and reception, with transitions being smoother.
In sum, it appears that none of the problems raised in the | previous GA review was addressed, so I am quick-failing this article. Feel free to resubmit the article when you have improved it, and post a message on my talk page as I would be free to review it again. Taewangkorea (talk) 00:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)