Talk:FIDO Alliance

Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

RRM2021 (talk · contribs) has been paid by ACCS on their behalf. https://www.accscheme.com/

.

Improper synthesis in criticism?[edit]

The criticism section links to articles saying that FIDO uses secp256r1, and articles saying that secp256r1 may be backdoored, but no articles linking the two together; the synthesis of the two seems to be the work of the editor, and AIUI Not Done on Wikipedia. ciphergoth (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. -- The Anome (talk) 10:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parallel Efforts[edit]

Are any parallel efforts underway? Are any other organizations addressing similar authentication problems and proposing alternative solution approaches, architectures, and standards? Is the FIDO alliance the only dog in the fight? It would be good if the article can answer these questions. Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 14:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FIDO Alliance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150401110242/https://fidoalliance.org/membership/members/ to https://fidoalliance.org/membership/members/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Historical Gaps[edit]

While Ramesh Kesanupalli, CTO of Validity Sensors, and Paypal did discuss as early as 2009 as listed on the FIDO website, the notable gap between 2009-2013 was not devoid of activity. Key alliances happened with AuthenTec, Inc., where amongst other things, the alliance's founding charter, legal construct, naming/branding, and cooperative guidelines were forged.

The FIDO branding was created by AuthenTec's Stephanie Griffin, first as a mascot and later transformed into its acronym form.

https://alter.com/trademarks/fido-85296575

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AuthenTec

HaKerr (talk) 00:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC) This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).[reply]

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]