Talk:Faile (artist collective)

Faile (artist collective) was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 25, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Graffiti (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graffiti, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GraffitiWikipedia:WikiProject GraffitiTemplate:WikiProject GraffitiGraffiti articles

Career section is extremely un-encyclopedic[edit]

The career section should likely be reduced to 10% of its current length, and cleaned up significantly to be something resembling encyclopedic. It is currently a gushing word salad of art critique, not encyclopedic information. 98.234.95.213 (talk) 04:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Intro reads like an advertisement[edit]

I have replaced the advert template, as the introduction is gushing, subjective, and very clearly written like an advertisement. 98.234.95.213 (talk) 04:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA fail[edit]

I have failed this article, mostly because of several issues with references:

Reliability and problems

I am not entirely sure if these references are to be trusted, they seem to be unreliable; one of the html links doesn't seem to be functional, another doesn't seem to atcually give any information... the problems go on

Number

There are only 5 references, and, as pointed out above, many are corrupted in their html format, unreliable, and non-informative.

Unsourced claims

...pepper the article. Get some references for these claims. I will attempt to put {{fact}} tags on the statements that need references especially.

Good luck in your improvements to the article. If there are any questions, they should be directed to my talk page. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 08:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note also that a general cleanup of prose and the article in general would certainly not go amiss. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 08:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]