Talk:Fair market value

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question[edit]

So if I have a business that grows debt free and has an gross of 10 million on its third year with 30 - 40 % going to payroll and other cost, whats my FMV? How does one calculate what it FMV is for a finacial statement or proposal?

Fair Market Value is only applicable upon services and goods that are offered in series/quantities. Simply, because FMV is based on comparison with identical or similar past, actual or expected service and goods. Allroundguy 02:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the Legal Citation[edit]

the legal citation in reference to the Canadian case is wrong, but I'm not doing Wiki's job for it, the only case summary of that is in D.T.C and the para pinpoint is off because there's only page references for that case from what I'm looking at in QuickLaw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.58.45.220 (talk) 20:47, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Real estate appraisal[edit]

User:67.80.208.114 put these comments on the main article, I'm moving them here:

- - The concensus of Appraisal Professionals is that FMV does not apply in

+ the appraisal process. But rather Market value, the word "fair" is no longer in use when describing Market Value. The definition of Fair market value (FMV) is the price that property would sell for on the open market. It is the price that would be agreed on between a willing buyer and a willing seller, with neither being required to act, and both having reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts. An appraisal determins Market Value, which is not necessarily the same as FMV. Grantors and Grantees can choose to buy or sell at a higher or lower price than determined Market Value.

There is no such entity as a FMV approach, but rather what is an appraisal industry

+ accepted, Market Value Approach, the word "fair" is no longer in use when describing Market Value. Also, the statement "These values can often give wildly different estimates than a fair market value (Read: Market Value) approach." is both mis-leading and unproven. Values are seldomly "wildly different" Values are often close in range, and relevant based on pertinent and relevant data that can be verified.

Someguy1221 02:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge suggestions[edit]

I removed the merge suggestions because this article refers to specific instances where "fair market value" is used and where the two suggestsion, market price and fair value are not used. Although when I removed the merge suggestions I goofed a little and refered to FMV twice and said market value when I, of course, meant market price and fair value.EECavazos 02:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fair market value. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140806233438/http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/chrts-gvng/chrts/plcy/csp/csp-f02-eng.html to http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/chrts-gvng/chrts/plcy/csp/csp-f02-eng.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]