Talk:FanDuel

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Starting the TALK discussion page[edit]

Every Wikipedia page needs TALK discussion to improve. Not seeing one, I'm starting one. Are there any criticisms for this web activity? Just asking, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 16:06, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one. Given that people pay more money for better players, how can this not be gambling? It's just like giving odds.Arlesd (talk) 23:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is an advertisement, as flagged. I agree it is gambling. I'd like to know what percentage of incoming player money gets paid back to winners. I know in Nevada, casinos must pay about 95% back in winnings. 108.19.53.96 (talk) 01:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gambling doesn't have to be a game of chance, but only a risky venture, which this certainly would be for most people. What's really wrong with this is that it encourages it. Just look at their TV commercials. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.26.8 (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Awards[edit]

This section seems dangerously close to being promotional. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guess the 5-25% fees they charge is not encyclopedic?[edit]

Also, 91% of the prize money is being won by 1.8% of the players. Guess this information that largely makes it prohibitive for any random player to expect success is just not encyclopedic in nature? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.251.239 (talk) 16:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The information I was looking for was exactly the arrangement is, which I can't find on their website, which only mentions winnings. What is the cost to those individuals who participate? It must be expensive if they can give away so much money. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FanDuel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071103133221/http://usgovinfo.about.com:80/b/a/217302.htm to http://usgovinfo.about.com/b/a/217302.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/sports/web-sites-blur-line-between-fantasy-sports-and-gambling.html?_r=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How can you update a logo?[edit]

Hello Wikipedians!

I came across this page before signing up for an account with them. I wasn't sure how legit they are, etc.. In any case, I noticed that their logo and other info on the page is outdated? Can someone let me know how I can update the logo? Would love to know for this page and future updates I do on other pages.

If there is a tutorial or link on how that can be done. It would be greatly appreciated

Thank you in advance EddieLara (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Figured it out by reading all the upload guidelines! If any issues, please let me know. I am still learning but this was a very interesting and fun experience to learn about all the different criteria EddieLara (talk) 16:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]