Talk:FasciaBlaster

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about FasciaBlaster.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Creation[edit]

Hi, this article is created after the permission from an admin please let him check. @User:StraussInTheHouse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia Hudson 1 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (An admin User:StraussInTheHouse gave me a permission to v=create this page and said it meets WPGNG I am not finding a place of draft please let him check and if there are problems please do let me know.) --Julia Hudson 1 (talk) 23:24, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's a very high bar for articles that make what are, essentially, medical claims, as this one does. Come back with references from a peer-reviewed journal, and we're talking. Right now what you've written is a heap of credulous nonsense indistinguishable from an advert. This is an encyclopedia, not Hello! magazine. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't yet completed the article and you placed that, please check now. I referenced everything and but now cleaned it up. You are an experienced person, you could help me understand or atleast guide to some tutorials or pages where I can learn. I was just following the lead. You can edit and eliminate anything that you think is not right. Julia Hudson 1 (talk) 23:50, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a notable product. It's snake oil - in the western sense. Your singular determination to persevere with it, having failed with your attempt to float an article for its creator, rings the normal WP:COI bells. I've already told you: come back with peer-reviewed journal articles backing up any of the health claims made, and we're back in business. Until then, bye bye article. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:54, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, please tell me where I can save it if deleted? It seems you took it personal. I have no issues, it was an admin who gave me a green signal, so I spent my time on it. There are multiple good articles which I thought would work. I'll dig up some more and will re-submit thanks. Julia Hudson 1 (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article clean-up[edit]

Hey all, don't want to rehash some of the arguments that showed up above, but I found this article today -- lots of easy changes can be to fix the overall "this page is trying to sell me this product" vibe that's going on. Going to make some minor edits this afternoon, let me know if you have feedback. Jayparkin (talk) 18:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]