Talk:Federal funds rate

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Federal funds rate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Federal funds rate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120718205758/http://meridianstar.com/national/x681144788/4-56-p-m-US-Closing-Stocks to http://meridianstar.com/national/x681144788/4-56-p-m-US-Closing-Stocks

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of Term[edit]

An IP editor attempted to add the following: I have deep confusion about Wiki defintion of Feds Fund rate as it says that the rate with which the financial institutions lend each other whereas I have seen it as the rate with which a central banks lend the commercial banks. Please clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.200.85 (talk) 10:15, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"What is the federal funds rate?"[edit]

When I ask "What is the federal funds rate?" there's a fair chance I might want to know ... [wait for it] ... what the rate is!! It is, as I type, 2.25-2.5%.

Yes, I could waste my time plowing through to find "Historical" (which is a word typically used for "NOT the present") and find a recent (though not up-to-date) rate.

OVER and OVER and OVER these days I discover -- to my sadness -- that Wikipedia isn't what it used to be. I'm sure this article, like so many others, conforms to someone's logic. IT DOES NOT CONFORM to the needs of Joe Public which often want simple fast answers to simple questions.

Should the article begin with a single-sentence paragraph stating the current rate? Perhaps not. BUT DO NOT REMOVE MY CHANGE unless you have a solution which addresses the problem.

Thanks in advance.Jamesdowallen (talk) 09:32, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Historical rates?[edit]

What is this? This section is about historical rates or rather about rate target? It should began from simple sentence like "The first time the rate was set on ... at ... level". The highest level was, the lowest level was etc. Please write properly.

Edit: You can use the paper - Anbil S. et al., "A New Daily Federal Funds Rate Series and History of the Federal Funds Market, 1928-1954", July 2020, https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2020.016

and paraphraze this: "The Federal Reserve publishes the standard daily-frequency time series for the federal funds rate, which begins in July 1954.3 However, the federal funds market came into being long before that, in the 1920s. This article introduces a new daily series for the federal funds rate that begins at the earliest possible date, April 1928, and continues to the start of the Federal Reserve's series."— Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.183.140.104 (talk) 20:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit 2: You can also use this citation of the same paper:

"The Herald Tribune reported the prevailing rates for April 4, 1928 as “3^3/4@4”, and indicated that the number to the left of @ was a bid rate and that to the right an offered rate" (Appendix, p. 22).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.183.140.104 (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).—Anita5192 (talk) 21:23, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is from a subheading close below your 2021 post.

"Rates since 2008 global economic downturn:"

the data from Dec 19, 2018 follows a pattern of "old figure" - "new figure"

the data from Jul 31, 2019 is chaotic

`Anita5192`

Can something be done to make the presented data stable? Yes, it refers to a solid source but the text/data as presented after a date-threshold is incoherent.

Seriously, the .gov doc is there, can the citation be dynamically gleaned from the source document? TIA

ReedScarce (talk) 18:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]