Talk:Fee-for-carriage

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is "Ultimately each station must be profitable on its own in order to justify continued operation." really part of the pro-fee-for-carriage side's arguement?[edit]

The "for" subsection of the "arguments" section states that "Ultimately each station must be profitable on its own in order to justify continued operation.". Is this really part of the pro-fee-for-carriage campaigns' argument? IMO it fits far better with the anti-fee-for-carriage campaign's "no bailout" theme than the pro-fee-for-carriage campaign's "save local television" theme. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 07:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same idea[edit]

If I heard right, a Shaw "overwrite" (in my terms used on foreign channels like broadcasting A&E in Canada) mentions a potential $2.0 billion bailout. Meanwhile, a "Save Local TV" campaign ad mentions a $2.0 billion profit to cable companies. It's the same financial figure, but both are interpreting it differently. Mechamind90 (talk) 23:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article scope[edit]

IMO either information on fee-for-carriage in other countries and fee-for-carriage in general should be added to thits article, or most of the Canada-specific information should be split into its' own article. I've added globalize and split tags. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 05:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]