Talk:Feniosky Peña-Mora

Untitled

This page needs to be flagged - it was likely written by the Pena-Mora himself and lacks independent sources for most of its claims. This article does not conform to Wikipedia's standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.195.102.37 (talk) 02:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Clean-up or Cover-Up?

First, I agree with the previous comment: claims are not supported by independent sources. Sounds like a C.V.

Second, the only critical paragraph in the entire page is "cleaned up"--the day after it was entered--to make the number of critics seem less. I think 99% of the faculty can accurately be described as "an overwhelming majority" don't you Jesse? Is that percentage correct?

This is a man with political ambitions using euphemisms like "diversity" and "technology" to be ruthless. Right now he is destroying the city agency he leads: giving high-paid positions of authority to inexperienced, unqualified people and driving out the real talent and knowledge. What the city saves by shorting well-earned pensions, it looses in multiples through the waste of taxpayers money on errors and huge salaries accompanying jobs given as political favors, including to those with close ties to firms that get big city contracts. Perhaps you were correct to remove the phrase "self-serving" but the term is accurate. He does not care about the city or its people. He is all about himself. Eduardo Pindar (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Please review WP:NPOV and WP:COI and then come back. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a soapbox. JesseRafe (talk) 21:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Also, Eduardo, before you go around making accusations, could you trouble yourself to do the most basic and simple research possible? In the not too distant past I removed needless fluff and peacocking and bragging weasel words from this article that clearly served to aggrandize Dr Pena-Mora beyond the bounds of basic neutral reporting. This can easily be seen on the "View History" tab or here: Overlong and over-detailed, COI or NPOV? and seems to have been copied and pasted from a CV. Please, learn how to be WP:CIVIL before talking to grown-ups on here. You don't know what side people are on. JesseRafe (talk) 22:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

You are right and I apologize to you.Eduardo Pindar (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Feniosky Peña-Mora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121118181012/http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/eng-rankings to http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/eng-rankings

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Feniosky Peña-Mora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170711140914/https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20160614/long-island-city/city-paid-magazine-publisher-devote-entire-issue-ddc-commissioner to https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20160614/long-island-city/city-paid-magazine-publisher-devote-entire-issue-ddc-commissioner
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170621143140/https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20170621/long-island-city/feniosky-pea-mora-resigns-department-of-design-and-consturction to https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20170621/long-island-city/feniosky-pea-mora-resigns-department-of-design-and-consturction

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)