Talk:Field Building (Chicago)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-You! Very Nice Story! Can it be Locked-Up???[edit]

This article has been polished very nicely! It couldn't be better! This is an example of why Wiki needs such articles to be locked-up better than they currently do??? Not much could be added to it. . . but anybody can just come along and MAKE CHANGES to this article. Architecture Group? Buildings Group? Chicago Group? SOMEBODY should be able to lock-up an entry such as this for folks who really want/need this information you know. Thank-You, again for such a GREAT job on this article!!! Lesbrown99 (talk) 17:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Address added, however the building has been renamed the Bank of America Building and the title of the article should probably be changed. Goldnpuppy (talk) 20:18, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I don't know how to lock it, but the title should still be changed to the Bank of America Building. Goldnpuppy (talk) 04:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My Reply[edit]

About all i can say on that is we DO commonly refer to buildings by name of origin. Example-It might be forever known as the such-and-such building since it was that originally. Links to this or that name can make up the difference, such as LaSalle Bank Building would probably then link to B.O.A. Building page! Probably doesn't matter which way and you can prob find examples on Wiki of the opposite as well. Good Article, though! Thanks! And Locking-Up will forever be a Wiki dilema, too! Lesbrown99 (talk) 17:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Field Building (Chicago). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:36, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]