Talk:Field hockey pitch
 | Field hockey pitch has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 22, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Field hockey pitch appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 May 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Field hockey pitch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 21:10, 21 April 2014 (UTC) I will be your reviewer. Please allow a couple of days for me to post comments. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
?
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- See below
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Good neutral handling of the criticism from India, which beggars belief
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Prose
- this is not seen as a sustainable option I had to look this up in the source to find out what it was talking about. can you add a bit moire from the source to exoplain what is meant by "sustainable" here?
- Comment
- Having played elite hockey on a sand surface - ouch!
- I also wasn't aware of the blue hockey pitch. The first time I ever saw one was in London 2012.
- Source review
- FN 25 - page number?
- Frequent - publishers? access dates?
- Overall
Some minor fixes and the article will be good. Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hawkeye7, many thanks for taking the time to review this. I've clarified the prose and done other minor source fixes (diff). However, the frequent refs were not missing publishers so not sure what you meant there. Regards, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 09:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC)