Talk:Film-out

Merge|Film recorder[edit]

Notes: Film-out has a different meaning, sort of, in the computer graphics and print worlds.
Merge|Film recorder|date=April 2007-
This has been here for some time now, with no talk about it. Removed for now. Add if you want to talk about it.Telecine Guy 06:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the Time-based media section and the NTSC, PAL, SECAM and HD video sub-sections[edit]

It is a good bet that a different term than "film out" is common in Europe. Anyone care to share? Another issue to be addressed... the various ways "film out" is spelled, at least in the U.S.

Eventually, if no one else gets to it first, I'll try my hand at parallel sub-sections from the perspective of other regional formats/industires, such as Europe's PAL.

Pricing in wikipedia articles?[edit]

I think we should omit the price altogether, it will be constantly changing (dropping); I think I've already heard of complete filmouts possible for as little as $10-20k. I'm sure more experienced wikipedians will know better than me about such policies. Binba 23:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NTSC[edit]

The section on NTSC does an easter-egg link to three-two pull down, where the the link and mention here in this article act like it would be a link to how a telecide aka film-out from NTSC to film is performed in order to convert 59.94 original fields into 24 film frames, as that problem is what the entire content of that section here is dedicated to, whereupon it acts like the answer to that problem would then be found at the linked article. However, the article three-two pull down is decidedly *NOT* about film-out in the Video section, but about telecine only, i. e. turning film into video. The only section there that actually deals with film-out is the Audio section, and only by describing that the audio needs to be slowed down. As such, I'm making the case the link is to the wrong article. --80.140.178.237 (talk) 22:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]