Talk:Finchley Lido

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Swimming Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Water polo work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Possible copyright infringement[edit]

user:the biggest jimmy appears to have cut and pasted sentences from [[1]].Grim23 (talk) 21:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, cut and paste- not good. However, TBH this is so much trivial, not Notable drivel I don't suppose anyone really cares.

IceDragon64 (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ref needed[edit]

I see no evidence that there were objections to the Gay Naked swimming in Finchley- the only ref is to a couple of objections in Manchester- and two objections is not "Strong" anyway.

IceDragon64 (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Style issues[edit]

I have tried to make this article more encyclopedic, but it still looks like a semi-advert and its not very well referenced. What evidence is there to show that it is "Very Popular" -indeed how would you measure this relative term? Why does it have so many words devoted to details of a pool which has gone years ago, with less details on what is there now?

Personally I have never felt that Wikipedias idea of Notability to local geography was very balanced anyway- why the existance of a little restaurant in a leisure complex is recorded in the world encyclopedia of Wikipedia I don't know.

IceDragon64 (talk) 22:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stafordshire marble?[edit]

Is this a particulare kind of marble, in which case can we have a link to that marble- or is it just any marble that happens to come from Staffordshire as the internal links suggest- in which case its completely trivial and should be removed.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Finchley Lido. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716035822/http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1948/OR1948.pdf to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1948/OR1948.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Finchley Lido. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050903094756/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/oliver.merrington/lidos/lidos1closed.htm to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/oliver.merrington/lidos/lidos1closed.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]