Talk:Fine Arts Quartet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A graph says it better than a table[edit]

I think that the graph showing the timeline of the quartet conveys the information better than a list of names. I would strongly support its return.

Great to see such an interest in the quartet! Like many people my age, their recordings were a mainstay of my student years.

Rconroy (talk) 14:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advantages of a table[edit]

The timeline graph has so many small horizontal pieces that it's hard to read. Moreover, it's difficult for the average editor to update.

It seems simpler and quicker to determine the Quartet's personnel at any given year by referring to the list of names which are each followed by a membership period.

Mamamorris (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]