Talk:Finger Lickin' Records

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

comment by Fingerlickin[edit]

{{Editprotected}} I must apgologise for my additions to the following page (Finger Lickin' Records) yesterday (29/05/07). Having never used or updated a Wikipedia article before I was not aware of your stringent rules regarding the nature of the material posted and in particular your rules concerning material that blatently promotes a company/ person. Having copied the material from the latest press release I can see how this may have breached your restrictions. I now notice that the my addition was deleted a few times without me realising.

I now have a revised biography that I would like to submit that details the labels tenth year in business. How do I go about getting the page unprotected and submitting the revised biography for review? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fingerlickin (talk • contribs).

OK, I'll assume good faith on this and unprotect the page. But I will keep an eye it, and one of the main guidelines is notability (please read this link before you repost), try and identify why this company is notable, because if there is a sniff of advertising or spam, someone will come along and put another speedy tag, or I will delete it. The fact that your username is the same as the company, leads me to believe there is a conflict of interest here (read here as well before you re-post), and again I am suspicious that you are just trying to promote a company you are involved with, but I'll wait to see. On a side note please remember to sign all your talk page posts using ~~~~. Any problems don't hesitate to give me a shout. ^Khukri 11:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finger Lickin' are an influential but small-ish label in the UK. Get mentioned a lot in UK national papers (Guardian etc.) but I don't have subscriptions so can't cite them properly. A Google search in the news archives gives a taste of what we should be able to populate the article with (see here). The current content is entirely inappropriate though. -- Siobhan Hansa 15:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ed zacchary, that's the sort of links and more it needs, but the editor is writing it as a promo piece, including the link and e-mail address at bottom. I can't see it surviving long though at this rate, unless it does get taken under someone's wing and it get's wikified. ^Khukri 17:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Finger Lickin' Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223115/http://www.breakspoll.com/winners2004.asp to http://www.breakspoll.com/winners2004.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]