Talk:Fishamble: The New Play Company

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fishamble: The New Play Company article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources[edit]

Some book sources exist, for example This Gist of It, Theatre Stuff: Critical Essays on Contemporary Irish Theatre, and The Continuum Companion to Twentieth Century Theatre so this probably ought not to be speedily deleted. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:53, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've started editing to find references and a quick search of Google Books shows these and several more. The newspaper references are extensive. Probably the page could use a rewrite though, some of the material I've found in the books is more noteworthy (and specific) than the entry currently is. JimHolden (talk) 01:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of three tags[edit]

Having read the sources, I reworked the page with references, restructured the sections (adding Awards) and took out a small amount of material on partnerships. That could perhaps go back in as its own section, but this time with references. Also I'm sure the notable writers list can be expanded. But all-in-all I believe the three templates I removed (references, structure and neutrality) have been addressed. JimHolden (talk) 12:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]