Talk:Fitness approximation

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Essay tag[edit]

This article does not conform to Wikipedia style guidelines in several ways. First, the lead section should provide context (what area of study is this?) and give a brief definition of the topic. The more detailed information should be separated out into separate sections. Finally, the article should be written in a more self-contained manner so that a reader with little knowledge of the will get some understanding of the subject. See WP:MOS and WP:MOSMATH for more information on Wikipedia style guidelines.--RDBury (talk) 18:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I read and try to understand a large number of articles in mathematics and optimization, and to be fair, this article is far more comprehensible than most. It's also one of the most useful articles I've read in a while and links in with a large body of existing knowledge, so in my opinion it also meets notably criteria. Support for keep. Doug (talk) 20:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improved MOS compliace but the lack of secondary sources remains a concern. Doug (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]