Talk:Five Pecks of Rice Rebellion

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taoism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaoismWikipedia:WikiProject TaoismTemplate:WikiProject TaoismTaoism articles

China

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles

Untitled[edit]

Didn't interwiki to zh:五斗米道 since those articles are about the movement and not the rebellion--Confuzion 04:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops... I went ahead and did do all the interwiki stuff before I read this. Perhaps it would simply be better to rename this page, since it is probably the religious movement itself that is of greater significance than the rebellion (which can't really be seperated from it). I don't know how to do it, or I would.--Alex Small 11:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

5 pecks?[edit]

A 斗 is a pretty large unit last I checked. -- Миборовский ^{U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai!} 05:50, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I simply used the name that the academic establishment gave it. Change that, and then change the page :) Kyosan Chugoku Zenmetsu! ;P struggle 12:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to a dictionary a 斗 is a unit of volume roughly 10 litres. (BTW, my knowledge of Romaji is limited to "Chugoku Banzai". :D) -- Миборовский ^{U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai!} 02:37, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that, but the page request was specifically "Five Pecks of Rice Rebellion." Here is the term in Kanji. 共産中国全滅!struggle 12:34, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Article on the Celestial Masters[edit]

I have just written a new article that covers the Way of the Celestial Master religious movement (that came as a result of the Five Pecks of Rice rebellion). I'm wondering whether it would be good to simply fold this article into the new one. I think that way some context could be extablished. Zeus1234 17:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]