Talk:Flaws and All/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:Legolas (talk2me) 04:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Be prepared. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • recorded by American R&B singer Beyoncé Knowles for her second studio album re-released, B'Day Deluxe Edition --> recorded by American R&B singer Beyoncé Knowles for the re-release of her second studio album, B'Day Deluxe Edition.  Done
  • wikilink B'day
  • "Flaws and All" is similar to earlier records by Knowles, most of which compared it to that of Dangerously in Love --> doesnt make sense
  • wikilink classic and ballad
  • in which he sees through all of her flaws and loves her unconditionally --> who sees through all of her flaws and loves her unconditionally
  • Knowles for the B'Day Anthology Video Album ---> Knowles for the B'Day Anthology Video Album  Done
  • italicize other instances of "B'Day", this is poor work.
  • the LEAD doesnot summarize the article.
  • Knowles discussed the concept for the video --> Knowles explained that the concept for the video  Done
  • please stop using apostrophed words like "doesn't" etc. -Not a problem here....? Theuhohreo (talk) 14:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • sees songwriting duties by --> songwriting duties? -Nothing wrong with that. Theuhohreo (talk) 14:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Taylor.Knowles and Taylor --> space  Done
  • Although the song was originally released during the re-release deluxe edition of B'Day, the song was included on many other releases. --> huh?  Done-Try re-reading, cause that was fine. Theuhohreo (talk) 14:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Flaws and All" garnered very positive reviews by critics, most of which complemented the ballad as a highlight of the album --> WP:OR, you cant generalize likie this Done
  • 'Flaws and All,' --> wrong, it should be 'Flaws and All', Done

OK enough, this article is just bad, bad, atrociously written. Please get a good copy-editor and then re-submit. Failing this. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]