Talk:FlexNet Publisher
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Related products[edit]
I think that this section might need to go; all I see is 3 spammy links that don't help to explain anything about FLEXlm. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 11:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, I found the article useful. I wanted to know if FlexLM was open source (it wasn't) and I learned who markets it now and what the new name is. FlexLM/FlexNet are widely used so the article should not go away. However, the link to the FlexLM FAQ is broken. 199.46.199.233 16:30, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Links to FLEXlm End Users Guide (versions 5 through 9.5) and FLEXnet End Users Guide (versions 10.0 and later, under the new brand) actually lead to 404 pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.88.4.6 (talk) 19:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
The reference #1 gives a broken link (404) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.118.35.248 (talk) 10:17, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
This software can cause problems for some boot managers, such as GRUB - maybe it's worth mentioning? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/441941 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.254.22.216 (talk) 22:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
List of applications/publishers that use this?[edit]
It's not clear which programs are using this, from looking casually at Google results. I notice most companies love to mention how many people use their stuff. 73.181.82.26 (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)