Talk:Flow map

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Visualization.

Maps High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove `\|autoi=yes`.

Article section(s) removed[edit]

Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed one or more section of this article for now.

I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.

-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 18:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Distinction from flow charts[edit]

Flow maps, as defined here, are obviously distinct from flowcharts as defined in that article. Flowcharts are a representation of an algorithm.

This obviously contrasts to what Phan has in mind when he said flow maps are "a mix of maps and flow charts, that show the movement of objects from one location to another, such as the number of people in a migration, the amount of goods being traded, or the number of packets in a network".

I'm not sure what to do about this. At the very least we should not link to our article on flowcharts from his quote. Perhaps we should also give a different initial definition in this article. Maybe we can still use his quote somewhere in the article but we'd have to make clear that he was using a different definition of flow chart.

In a related issue, I note this article says "Flow Maps are one of the ten diagrams defined in Thinking Maps." However, the Thinking Maps article indicates that by flow map they mean what we are talking about in the flowchart article!

Yaris678 (talk) 16:01, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flow map. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090426090822/http://flowmap.geog.uu.nl/ to http://flowmap.geog.uu.nl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page overhaul[edit]

I have heavily edited this page, adding a lot of content, figures, and citations. It was barely an outline previously. I reset the quality settings so the page can be re-reviewed. Bplewe (talk) 06:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]