Talk:Floyd Landis doping case

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cycling: Tour de France

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Tour de France task force.

Pharmacology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Detailed test reports[edit]

Have any test reports actually been released?

I have only seen secondary reports about the results of the tests. Why aren't the test reports themselves released?

It would be probative with regards to the truth of this situation if the quantitative results from different labs of similar samples could be compared. Right now all that seems to be available are the statements categorizing the results by the testing agencies.

Test reports are particularly important for the isotope testing done on the testosterone. These tests were almost brand new at the time they were done and it seems particularly important that the details of exactly what was done and what the quantitative results were be made public if the test results are to be seen as highly credible.

Has anybody come across any actual test reports? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davefoc (talk • contribs) 02:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To answer my own question: A detailed report of the arbitration hearing that decided the Landis case is available on-line: http://www.usantidoping.org/files/active/arbitration_rulings/Landis%20Final%20%2820-09-07%29%20%283%29.pdf

The report includes a great deal of quantitative data including quantitative results from tests run on the A and B samples.Davefoc (talk) 04:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stage 16[edit]

In the lead it says Landis lost 10 minutes on stage 16 but in the prelude section it says he lost 8 minutes. Which is correct? Mobile mundo (talk) 19:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Floyd Landis doping case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705232319/http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/13354.0.html to http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/13354.0.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/latestnews/stories/wfaa060731_mo_landis.ae9233.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]