Talk:Flu (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The title of the film[edit]

The English title of the film as used by the Korean Film Council is kind of irrelevant. This article should be titled by the name used in the English-speaking world (US, UK, etc. - WP:NCF, WP:EN) and that title is FLU. Just giving the heads up before moving it back. Cheers Film Fan 13:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Korean Film Council lists in their database what the Korean studios/production companies themselves have designated as the official English-language international title of a movie (for purposes of release, promotion, etc.). There's no need for an "aka" since the original Korean title literally translates to "Flu" anyway. The contention here is the use of "The" in the title. Regarding what is "used in the English-speaking world," trade papers such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, Screen International and Film Business Asia use both: "Flu" [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] vs. "The Flu" [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]. So given that both are in use and the English meaning the same, I think it best to default to the international title chosen by the production company in the first place (rather than some arbitrary gauge). As I previously mentioned in my edit summary, even the official movie poster clearly states "The Flu" in English (below the Korean title in Hangul) [13] [14]. Melusine1997 (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The title used by the distributors in English-speaking countries is the main title used in Wikipedia articles. Read WP:NCF and WP:EN if in doubt. Since the title "The Flu" is clearly an alternative used in Korea, it can be listed as an AKA. That title may have also been used at a festival or two, hence a small number of old, English-language articles also using that title. Film Fan 06:46, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Flu (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]