Talk:Fluoride Free WA

Australia: Western Australia / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Fluoride Free WA is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Oceania's "10,000 Challenge", which started in November 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Speculation[edit]

Articles on political parties should reflect what has happened, or will happen with reasonable certainty (e.g. the election will be held on 11 March), not not speculate on the outcome based on the opinion of commentators. The same way we don't say Mark McGowan will be the next premier, just because he is ahead in the polls or some commentators predict it. And lets face it, commentators have got things horribly wrong in some recent elections/referendums in the last year. 108.171.134.162 (talk) 05:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, restored the other facts without the note about which region the analyst says the votes roll up to FFWA in. --Scott Davis ^Talk 06:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]